Cialis side effects a wife’s perspective

Through the eyes of women: the partners’ perspective on tadalafil.
Objectives: To evaluate patient and female partner responses on the efficacy of, and overall satisfaction with, tadalafil to treat erectile dysfunction using sexual encounter profile (SEP) diaries.
Methods: Data were pooled from four double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week trials that included 746 couples. Patients were randomized to placebo or tadalafil 10 or 20 mg. Efficacy was evaluated by the mean per-patient/per-partner percentage of “yes” responses to patient SEP questions 1, 2, and 5 and partner SEP questions 1 to 3 (erection achievement, penetration, and overall satisfaction with the sexual experience, respectively) for tadalafil versus placebo. For each SEP question, the number of postbaseline intercourse attempts when each couple agreed on the outcome was tabulated and divided by the total number of postbaseline attempts to calculate the mean percentage of agreement by couple. The overall satisfaction with successful postbaseline intercourse attempts was determined.
Conclusions: Partners reported significantly improved overall sexual satisfaction and corroborated the man’s report of improved erections and penetration ability with tadalafil 10 mg or 20 mg. Men reported improved erection achievement, penetration, and overall satisfaction with the sexual experience after taking tadalafil.
Similar articles.
Althof SE, Rubio-Aurioles E, Kingsberg S, Zeigler H, Wong DG, Burns P. Althof SE, et al. Urology. 2010 Jun;75(6):1358-63. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.066. Epub 2010 Mar 5. Urology. 2010. PMID: 20206967.
Eardley I, Gentile V, Austoni E, Hackett G, Lembo D, Wang C, Beardsworth A. Eardley I, et al. BJU Int. 2004 Oct;94(6):871-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05049.x. BJU Int. 2004. PMID: 15476525 Clinical Trial.
Seftel AD, Wilson SK, Knapp PM, Shin J, Wang WC, Ahuja S. Seftel AD, et al. J Urol. 2004 Aug;172(2):652-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000132857.39680.ce. J Urol. 2004. PMID: 15247754 Clinical Trial.
Montorsi F, Padma-Nathan H, Glina S. Montorsi F, et al. Urology. 2006 Sep;68(3 Suppl):26-37. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.06.027. Urology. 2006. PMID: 17011373 Review.
Mulhall JP, Levine LA, J√ľnemann KP. Mulhall JP, et al. Urology. 2006 Sep;68(3 Suppl):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.05.041. Urology. 2006. PMID: 17011372 Review.
Cited by.
Wang H, Zhao M, Zhang J, Yan B, Liu S, Zhao F, Guo J, Wang F. Wang H, et al. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 May 9;2022:4807271. doi: 10.1155/2022/4807271. eCollection 2022. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022. PMID: 35586692 Free PMC article. Review.
Kang DH, Lee JY, Park SY, Moon HS, Jeong TY, Yoo TK, Choi HY, Park HY, Lee TY, Lee SW. Kang DH, et al. Korean J Urol. 2010 Sep;51(9):647-52. doi: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.9.647. Epub 2010 Sep 17. Korean J Urol. 2010. PMID: 20856651 Free PMC article.
Sadovsky R, Brock GB, Gutkin SW, Sorsaburu S. Sadovsky R, et al. Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Aug;63(8):1214-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02119.x. Int J Clin Pract. 2009. PMID: 19624789 Free PMC article. Review.